White People’s Friendships are Racially Limited

White People’s Friendships are Racially Limited

While the average Black American has eight White friends, White Americans only have one Black friend. Research by the Public Religion Research Institute finds that 75% of White people have “entirely white social networks without any minority presence.” Researcher Robert Jones argues the lack of diversity amongst White social networks has a negative impact on civil society. White people lack a personal connection to Black history and culture because they don’t receive adequate formal education on these issues, and because they do not know many Black people. As a result, they are not forced to see and recognise the marginalisation that Black people go through. As such, Jones argues, White people are not “socially positioned” to understand the significance of events at Ferguson and other civil disputes.

This data is backed up by a recent Pew Research study which finds that only 37% of White Americans think Michael Brown’s death and subsequent events in Ferguson raise important issues about race, in contrast to 80% of Black people who do see the connection to racism.

In sociology, we use the concept of homophily to explain the structure of social networks. This word literally means “love of the same.” In sociology, this concept measures how little people mix outside their groups, and the consequences of this lack of intermingling. On the outside, friendship groups seem diverse because we tend to think of relationships in reference to individuals. For example: I have a friend who is outgoing and likes horror films and manga comics; I have another friend who’s quiet and likes 70s rock music; another friend likes going to the art gallery and reading Margaret Atwood books; and so on. The fact is, that most people tend to know people similar to themselves where it really counts: along racial and socio-economic lines.

Research shows that lack of diversity in White people’s friendship circles has a societal impact, in that it stagnates social change. White people share the balance of social power, whether they like to admit to it or not. People of colour find ways to connect with White people, but the reverse is not true of the majority of White people. Friendships don’t just “naturally” happen; they aren’t even the strict outcome of personalities or personal preferences. Social relationships are one clear way that power and the status quo are maintained.

Credits & Learn More

Information on race in social networks and graphic via Washington Post: http://buff.ly/XUw3oz

Pew study: http://buff.ly/XUw3oA

On homophili:

A classic study: http://buff.ly/XUw5wS

Broader impact on social organisation: http://buff.ly/XUw5wT

Race & impact on elite structures in society: http://buff.ly/XUw5wU

#sociology #socialscience #ferguson #michaelbrown #racism

6 thoughts on “White People’s Friendships are Racially Limited


  1. Interesting. Thinking of reposting with the header, “I am your one black friend.” šŸ˜‰


    As a side note, Washington Post, I’m guessing the rounding somehow throws all the numbers of on the chart. It claims 100 friends for both groups, but the totals are 99 and 101.

    Like


  2. That’s the spirit, Zoey ColeĀ it is sad and funny when you think about it. Unfortunately, it throws off the whole, “I’m not racist I have [one] Black friends!” argument, since three quarters of White Americans don’t even have any Black friends. It also throws into question the faux argument about “post-racial” societies where race is supposed to be a non-issue.


    Yes the figures are simplified for visualisation.

    Like


  3. What’s the null hypothesis?


    In a country where there is a larger fraction of white people, if people were friends with 100 others, then most of them would have more white friends. But that would also be true for black people.


    So the biases seem to be in both directions. Only a real quantitative analysis using e.g. the Kullback-Leibler divergence with the random friends distribution would tell us which ethnicity is further from random.


    What you’re really showing so far is that there is preferential attachment when making groups of friends and that may well be due to simple geographic distribution…

    Like


  4. HiĀ Romain BrasseletĀ Read the original link to the study where this comes from and then the other links I’ve provided. Yes, there are more White people in America (63% are White non Hispanic/Latino), but that does account for the lack of racial intermixing by White people. As Pew Research data show, White people self-segregate – that is, White people do not mix with other races on average on purpose (http://goo.gl/UzEbhL). Again, read the studies I’ve linked to before dismissing data you don’t like. And by the way – there’s no such thing as “simple geographic distribution.” Racial segregation is a result of racist practices. I’ve written about this here (http://goo.gl/W1uN9u).

    Like


  5. The Other Sociologist sorry I don’t have time right now to read everything, but quickly browsing I haven’t seen any clear-cut data analysis. But I admit I may have missed it.


    My question is whether the distribution of people explains the lack of interracial mixing by Black people. Could it be that Black people also self-segregate? I’m just wondering here. And I try to see to what extent the data says something about that. You see?


    BTW, I very much like this data, I have no problem with it. I just want to make sure the interpretation is solid and not biased. No ideology involved. Pure data analysis.


    Finally, I agree that segregation is also the result of racist practices, but not only and they might only be mild, see for example the Schelling model. I’m just wondering, once there is segregation, to what extent it reinforces unmixed social networks. In any city (segregated or not) people are more likely to be friend with neighbours, so in a segregated city, people are more likely to be friends with people of the same ethnicity. Now, finding which feature is the origin of the others is a hard problem.

    Like


  6. Romain BrasseletĀ The data are not biased otherwise I would not post this, but perceptions of data can be biased, such as when people refuse to accept data they don’t like because it conflicts with their personal politics or worldview. Racism describes a system of oppression that is reinforced in many ways. Residential segregation is one way this plays out. It is White class interests, not Black self-segregation, that keeps this system in place.Ā I’ve addressed all of this and the other issues you raise in the links provided, including a critique of the Schelling model. If you’re serious about wanting to learn more on this topic, you’ll read the links. šŸ˜‰

    Like

Leave a Reply to Zoey Cole Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s